Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: Drop rates

#2
No information has been given. Drop rates for anything good are probably worst out of any chest the game has had. Full of aeon and several old fash types that should have been removed by now. Mount tokens seam super rare compared to how they were. These are just my observations tho.
Server: Danu since 2011
Clan - Ascension
Sockthief -- Level 227 Ranger
Siegengine -- Level 182 Warrior
Stinkysock -- Level 180 Rogue

Re: Drop rates

#4
Lorhad Owens wrote:So I haven’t played in a looooong time but I’m thinking of coming back. I wanna buy plat but I want to know if they released the rates yet.


Not that I'm aware of but I can assure you drop rates have not improved whatsoever.
Brevity is the soul of wit so i will talk your ears off.

Re: Drop rates

#6
My personal opinion is that releasing the drop rates will only make people more upset. I get the whole "legally obligated" aspect, and I'm glad that so many of you are so worried about small legalities. However, what surprises me is the fact that people care so much about finding out just how tiny the chance of getting item X is. It ain't gonna make a difference in your results whether you know that you have a 0.42147% chance of getting a dragon egg, or if it's a complete mystery.

Releasing the drop rates will only cause more complaints, and not solve any issues or make people feel better (aside from the occasional person who bought 2 chests, got an uber rare item, and could then put numbers to their bragging rights). It would just cause more chaos on the forums and unhappiness among the players.
Eragon123 - lvl 220 ranger
Zamorak1 - lvl 220 mage
Sulis
Have questions about anything? PM me!

Harbinger of cold hard logic and reason.
Go Team #WorldSkillsUSA!
Latest Celtic Heroes Database Update: Character Creator!

Re: Drop rates

#7
Eragon123 wrote:My personal opinion is that releasing the drop rates will only make people more upset. I get the whole "legally obligated" aspect, and I'm glad that so many of you are so worried about small legalities. However, what surprises me is the fact that people care so much about finding out just how tiny the chance of getting item X is. It ain't gonna make a difference in your results whether you know that you have a 0.42147% chance of getting a dragon egg, or if it's a complete mystery.

Releasing the drop rates will only cause more complaints, and not solve any issues or make people feel better (aside from the occasional person who bought 2 chests, got an uber rare item, and could then put numbers to their bragging rights). It would just cause more chaos on the forums and unhappiness among the players.


True, but if they are upset, then just don't buy chests. Virtual Realms just needs to follow through with Apple's rules.

Re: Drop rates

#8
Eragon123 wrote:My personal opinion is that releasing the drop rates will only make people more upset. I get the whole "legally obligated" aspect, and I'm glad that so many of you are so worried about small legalities. However, what surprises me is the fact that people care so much about finding out just how tiny the chance of getting item X is. It ain't gonna make a difference in your results whether you know that you have a 0.42147% chance of getting a dragon egg, or if it's a complete mystery.

Releasing the drop rates will only cause more complaints, and not solve any issues or make people feel better (aside from the occasional person who bought 2 chests, got an uber rare item, and could then put numbers to their bragging rights). It would just cause more chaos on the forums and unhappiness among the players.

They are breaking Apple’s policy. Do you still want updates for CH?
Belenus
Nee 229 druid
ApplesBe 225 ranger
GetBashedX 222 warrior
Rainyy 200 rogue

Nuada
Meja druid

Re: Drop rates

#10
‘Apps offering “loot boxes” or other mechanisms that provide randomized virtual items for purchase must disclose the odds of receiving each type of item to customers prior to purchase.’

They’re going against their terms here

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ColdBurn1 and 19 guests