tayilern wrote:Tritor wrote:tayilern wrote:
Just like they say serious dps rangers are strength and auto build lol. You dont have to follow the social norm, every warrior ive had I've always used pro stance... highest i had was only 170 but thats that's pretty far imo to get a good understanding and i never had problems with damage. Maybe that's because im content with what i choose lol. Warriors aren't rogues. If they wanna use doch gul they should use pro stance if they wanna survive.
That just sounds like ignorance to me dps warrior using pro stance smh
Okay, go use doch gul without pro stance at bt lol. See how many times u die, compare the dmg to what you do with, when u die a lot less, and don't have to wait much on respawns, then tell me what's better for dps.. Obviously if you want better damage you're gonna use frenzy, but if you're being real, you'd use pro stance. No need to throw shade with ignorance comments, because I've probably played longer than you, and i also probably could be a bigger **** than you, so pick and choose your battles completely unnecessary smh. It's the internet though, people love to talk **** haha, keyboard warriors.
Well while you're insulting other posters but then calling them keyboard warriors, explain how pro stance helps with survivability when you're taking elemental and poison damage.
There's a huge difference at being level 170 and in a lixing build compared to end game bossing build.
And time in game isn't always an indication of knowledge (although it should be).