Celtic Heroes

Rangers are better DPS period, so yes, there really was no point to this "stupid argument". I'm amazed that it even got this far.

Wha wha wha wha
May wanna clarify .-. No ranger will outdps a decent mage on a mob with 0 resists (like obelisk of power) even if they haste up .-.
Cuz of divine damage rangers are da best on chaos bosses unless they have super low elemental resists (like 205 210 edl for ice and 195 185 edl For Fire)

Rangers are better DPS period, so yes, there really was no point to this "stupid argument". I'm amazed that it even got this far.

Wha wha wha wha
May wanna clarify .-. No ranger will outdps a decent mage on a mob with 0 resists (like obelisk of power) even if they haste up .-.
Cuz of divine damage rangers are da best on chaos bosses unless they have super low elemental resists (like 205 210 edl for ice and 195 185 edl For Fire)

Rangers are better DPS period, so yes, there really was no point to this "stupid argument". I'm amazed that it even got this far.

Wha wha wha wha
May wanna clarify .-. No ranger will outdps a decent mage on a mob with 0 resists (like obelisk of power) even if they haste up .-.
Cuz of divine damage rangers are da best on chaos bosses unless they have super low elemental resists (like 205 210 edl for ice and 195 185 edl For Fire)

Rangers are better DPS period, so yes, there really was no point to this "stupid argument". I'm amazed that it even got this far.

Wha wha wha wha
May wanna clarify .-. No ranger will outdps a decent mage on a mob with 0 resists (like obelisk of power) even if they haste up .-.
Cuz of divine damage rangers are da best on chaos bosses unless they have super low elemental resists (like 205 210 edl for ice and 195 185 edl For Fire)