Page 6 of 8

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:15 pm
by Hawkye
Amen

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:20 pm
by SecretsOfLife
One word

Opinions ;)

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:52 pm
by Chelseam2
SecretsOfLife wrote:One word

Opinions ;)



Opinions don't get anyone thing anywhere. So actually lets call it facts or observations, what about we turn it into a scientific law? One word, science.

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 7:48 pm
by Napol
SecretsOfLife wrote:One word

Opinions ;)


You are a rogue. You might be entitled to your own opinion but don't tell a high level or even mid level ranger that they are fine the way they are. Low level rangers don't quite see what the higher levels are putting up with, so they normally don't count. Why don't you level with a ranger your level and see for yourself?

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:24 pm
by Chelseam2
Napol wrote:
SecretsOfLife wrote:One word

Opinions ;)


You are a rogue. You might be entitled to your own opinion but don't tell a high level or even mid level ranger that they are fine the way they are. Low level rangers don't quite see what the higher levels are putting up with, so they normally don't count. Why don't you level with a ranger your level and see for yourself?




He will give up before he gets that far and he would just say its easy anyways so he won't be prooved wrong.

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 12:16 am
by Napol
I know, but worth a shot. ;)

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 3:59 pm
by Criminal
Napol wrote:
SecretsOfLife wrote:One word

Opinions ;)


You are a rogue. You might be entitled to your own opinion but don't tell a high level or even mid level ranger that they are fine the way they are. Low level rangers don't quite see what the higher levels are putting up with, so they normally don't count. Why don't you level with a ranger your level and see for yourself?

being lvl 121 isnt very high as well

i wouldnt judge according to lvls, my alts are 106 rogue, 105 ranger, 73 mage, 50/75 druids, and my main is 168 warrior

besides being a warrior, im pretty sure that even while having low lvls alts, i can advice u better than many 170+ on any of those classes (except maybe druid, barely play this class)
if u got high lvl main and u saw other classes and checked them within time, u will be good enough to advice and share facts u found about those classes

anyway, once again, rangers arent weak, yes they're extremely weak for pvp, but they're the cheapest class and best one for soloing, and as an end game class, they're very strong, having over 2k dmg with no problem and no heavy wep

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:36 pm
by Napol
Criminal wrote:
Napol wrote:You are a rogue. You might be entitled to your own opinion but don't tell a high level or even mid level ranger that they are fine the way they are. Low level rangers don't quite see what the higher levels are putting up with, so they normally don't count. Why don't you level with a ranger your level and see for yourself?

being lvl 121 isnt very high as well

i wouldnt judge according to lvls, my alts are 106 rogue, 105 ranger, 73 mage, 50/75 druids, and my main is 168 warrior

besides being a warrior, im pretty sure that even while having low lvls alts, i can advice u better than many 170+ on any of those classes (except maybe druid, barely play this class)
if u got high lvl main and u saw other classes and checked them within time, u will be good enough to advice and share facts u found about those classes

anyway, once again, rangers arent weak, yes they're extremely weak for pvp, but they're the cheapest class and best one for soloing, and as an end game class, they're very strong, having over 2k dmg with no problem and no heavy wep


I was including myself in the mid level range seeing as I haven't even hit 140 yet (but admittedly it has been awhile since I updated my sigs lvls). In case you hadn't noticed I keep my advice out of the 140+ level questions- doesn't mean I don't read em I do, I just don't pipe up. I am not sayin I know the whole class from bottom up, but At least past halfway. ;)

One reason I normally don't pipe up on other classes sites is because I don't really have experience at any of the other classes above level 100- and the mains of a class know more than the casual observer.

I would agree on your pvp, best for soloing (only because with the right build it can be almost impossible to die training), cheapest not so sure but we at least don't have to keep buying armor, we can make do with pretty much whatever although lux is a necessity (quiver, ammy, extras), (yes also the end game- at least OTM got that right), no heavy weap that's the key. :D But in order to get to the 'ultimate' section you gotta go through the mid levels- your ranger needs about 5-10 more levels to start experiencing the drag, although you might have started with it a bit ago.

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 4:35 pm
by Chelseam2
Wow guys. Bogans, and then its a whole new game plan. No one can imagine how hard it is besides for the low armored and not "guaranteed dps" classes.


I see rogue and warriors go at bogans and to them it is nothing, but then a ranger solo trains and oh boy.

Re: Rangers too weak?

Posted: Fri Nov 08, 2013 7:41 pm
by Napol
Chelseam2 wrote:Wow guys. Bogans, and then its a whole new game plan. No one can imagine how hard it is besides for the low armored and not "guaranteed dps" classes.


I see rogue and warriors go at bogans and to them it is nothing, but then a ranger solo trains and oh boy.


My point exactly and another reason that I prefer to solo level in otherworld... once I get froz aura its the lava fields for me. :D