Page 1 of 1

Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:23 am
by Calamity
The rogues t8 offhand does not dispel the necro ghosts cloak. Is this a bug/glitch or was this intentional? I for one as a dedicated ghost rogue would love to have the t8 spite dispel ghosts cloak.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:42 am
by Lucerin
QS or SS or both don’t?

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 6:45 am
by Alyssandra
Pretty sure its intentional, but VR can confirm. Further example, new druid offhand skills don’t dispel ghost dot, nor do they get rid of gele debuff. Seems like the different offhands are intended to be used for different occasions rather than being a straight upgrade.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 7:22 am
by Calamity
Lucerin wrote:QS or SS or both don’t?

Cant speak for qs users but i can confirm ss doesn’t.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 3:52 pm
by Robert
Quick Strike does, Shadow Strike doesn’t.

Also, the Quickstrike one overwrites EDL / DL spite whereas the ShadowStrike doesn’t.

I’m assuming that’s because the QS rondel is the 3/0 of the same skill from EDL and DL spites, which are 2/0 and 1/0; Whereas the ShadowStrike rondel is a new skill entirely.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Sun Jul 08, 2018 8:33 pm
by Alyssandra
Robert wrote:Quick Strike does, Shadow Strike doesn’t.

Also, the Quickstrike one overwrites EDL / DL spite whereas the ShadowStrike doesn’t.

I’m assuming that’s because the QS rondel is the 3/0 of the same skill from EDL and DL spites, which are 2/0 and 1/0; Whereas the ShadowStrike rondel is a new skill entirely.


Good to know, would be nice if other classes’, and the other rogue offhands would all keep their previous usage if the qs one does.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Mon Jul 09, 2018 4:59 am
by Tadaaah
Pretty sure it's intentional, but more than happy to double check.

Re: Glitch or intentional?

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2018 5:47 am
by Calamity
Tadaaah wrote:Pretty sure it's intentional, but more than happy to double check.


Just curious as to what the verdict is on this :)