Celtic Heroes

The Official Forum for Celtic Heroes, the 3D MMORPG for iOS and Android Devices

Re: Upside down approach

#31
Tadaaah wrote:
Robert wrote:@Tadaaah

Why not just not intervene at all when it comes to email addresses / account ownership?

As in the account is owned by the email address holder, and only do things for inactive accounts in cases when the owner has lost access to the email address.

Would definitely save you guys a lot of time. I understand why you have the policies that are in place though, but as everyone knows (on any game) account sharing is very prevalent which is just going to cause extra work for support down the line rather than policies that account for it, and not provide suppo t do players that do break the rules.


Again, it's not all black and white. Each ticket is unique and takes quite a bit of time. That is why some accounts are locked down; we don't offer support to the account anymore because it's overly apparent that the account has been transferred/shared in abundance. Also, another example of why you SHOULDN'T BUY accounts. We've seen instances where a player sells an account. Then, they come to support to reclaim ownership. Rinse and repeat. Once we can see that, those accounts are also locked down. So don't buy an account, because you'll likely just lose your money. Y'all should spread that one around. In a sense, these rules aren't just in place for us; they protect players too.

For clan banks, yes, that far precedes me. My understanding is that while we turn a blind eye; we also aren't supposed to offer support for clan banks.

Again, the changes haven't changed the Terms of Service or the rules. You shouldn't have anything to worry about. It just gives us more flexibility when we need it.

He's talking about sharing not buyingn
Nuada:
King - 223 warrior


Taranis:
190 warrior. Plan to get 220 if the lag ever fixes

Re: Upside down approach

#32
Corrupt wrote:He's talking about sharing not buyingn


They both have issues though. Imagine persons 1 and 2 are sharing an account, person 1 is using the character the most, and loads it up with gear and money, then person 2 decides he wants that gear, trades it off to his main, and bam. Person 1 can’t do anything about it. Obviously there are other issues too...that’s just one possibility.
Eragon123 - lvl 220 ranger
Zamorak1 - lvl 220 mage
Retribution - Sulis
Sneaky o.O
Have questions about anything? PM me!

Latest Celtic Heroes Database Update: Character Creator! Go Team #WorldSkillsUSA!

Re: Upside down approach

#34
Guthix123 wrote:
Corrupt wrote:He's talking about sharing not buyingn


They both have issues though. Imagine persons 1 and 2 are sharing an account, person 1 is using the character the most, and loads it up with gear and money, then person 2 decides he wants that gear, trades it off to his main, and bam. Person 1 can’t do anything about it. Obviously there are other issues too...that’s just one possibility.

That's the risk they take when they share accounts. It has its pros and cons
Nuada:
King - 223 warrior


Taranis:
190 warrior. Plan to get 220 if the lag ever fixes

Re: Upside down approach

#36
Sharing should be punished by OTM’s inability to help you out if your account comes into conflict through sharing. A ban is very harsh for such a minute offence that really harms no one.
UltimateIronman - Level 50 Morrigan

Youtube Series here

Re: Upside down approach

#37
Chaotic wrote:Sharing should be punished by OTM’s inability to help you out if your account comes into conflict through sharing. A ban is very harsh for such a minute offence that really harms no one.

Actually benefits clans greatly
Nuada:
King - 223 warrior


Taranis:
190 warrior. Plan to get 220 if the lag ever fixes

Re: Upside down approach

#38
I feel that this conversation has spiraled I got the understanding I was looking for and perhaps this thread should be locked so it doesn’t send too many mixed signals to people.
World - Gwydion
Clan - Relentless
Relentlessly killing Bloodthorn in search of the hidden helmet that is buried deep in the coding of RNG. We would love to see you join us on our quest for the hidden helmet.

Re: Upside down approach

#39
As long as we don't have people sending tickets or coming to cry on the forums about how their account got "hacked" then i don't mind. Since that just gives otm more work for something they didn't allow ;)
Blzzrd 225+ Rogue
Aethra 170+ Rogue
Shivah 220+ Mage
Siege 150+ Warrior

Ascension of Danu

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests