Thing is we didnt agree on all the things you are blaming us for. And can you really blame otm for accepting the best applications? I trust that otm would be smarter than to let the voice of one clan (more than half our testers went almost inactive due to personal issues) guide the beta. Anything that went through was supported by the majority, or in the case of target lock, because otm said so.
Avalon did not make death penalty, otm added it in the first beta build and the majority supported it. Bone smasher from avalon hates it (he was in beta)
We did not make up the chaos thing, otm did and added it near the end which prevented us from testing low level bosses.
Rage times was agreed on by most of beta as the majority was anti target lock and did not want underpowered groups holding bosses for longer than they should
Target lock was very split in beta, including in avalon. Otm kept it and it has turned into the bigger griefing tool in the game.
Making bosses harder was completely on otm, it was not even suggested by anyone nevermind avalon, a few of us complained actually that ow bosses all gained 10 levels.
And do you all want to know why dogma is hating on avalon? I probably get in trouble for this but im fed up. In the early stage of beta otm had removed the "you killed" indicator after something died and changed it to "your group killed" this interferes with testing balance and dps as well as removed friendly inner clan competition. Dogma supported it staying as "your group killed" (god knows why) and when all of beta turned and said the opposite, he decided to take it out on avalon because of our large population, when in fact ALL of beta disagreed with him. He then proceeded to call us all dps goddesses and quit beta for being "gang banged" by the avalon "sheep"
pigman, with the fury of the pigs and the mind of a man
level 210+ rogue
put your pants on, we're going out