Criminal wrote:There are some super cancerous replies here which again as Ive said over and over and over and over and over... This clan-specific way of discussion is what makes ur data less objective and thus less impressive and usable.
Once u come here with the idea of "I think the drop rates arent fair, and here I have provided data to help confirm my statement" instead of "Drop rates are sh*t, my clan gets nothing, all our items are useless except 1, give us stuff" then perhaps u will proceed anywhere.
The word "useful" or "wanted" and such are very very subjective, to the type of ppl, clans, roles, classes, drop system... And in a server which again I assume has no dps warrior but a godly dps warrior misc (no one has rejected it yet from Relentless so I'll keep at that), I find that not mentioning one of the best drops to one of the best dps classes (2nd best, rogue still 1st) is another way to be biased, subjective, emotional... Whatever u want to call it.
Come back with actual meaning to help the community, not with the demand for VR to cater to ur clan. I am not sure how many times I need to tell it to u guys until u understand that it only hurts u.
The act of making statements against someone else’s point of view with out using facts.
Hmm one side presented facts...
Theres a point in time when u should consider that if the main dev is outright using sarcasm at ur 10th post about the same issue that perhaps the attitude ur using is wrong. U asked for constructive criticism, u got the constructive criticism. The fact u keep shooting me down is outright showing that u dont want any opinion that isnt an agreement on the matter.
Yes, I think u need to consider the way u approach the same subject several times. Dont say ur using facts when u claim that the only drop worth mentioning is a godly ranger misc, while ur rocking multiple helms, other BIS godly drops, 14 imperial ability rings, 12 royals, and idk how many good cooldown rings. Thats what I call bias and subjectiveness, thats what I call being outright cancerous in the way u approach the matter.
The fact ur using the way Schwing used sarcasm towards u on other comments only makes it a stronger point that his sarcasm towards u comes from a good reason. Perhaps when u use the same sarcasm used at u, u need to re-evaluate ur argument.